@all

describes the latest run using a new first-principles DFT calculator to measure magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy via the total energy difference method. More results will follow.

This post explains how to run VASP with GPU acceleration inside Modal. It uses VASP version 6.3.0 and should work for other 6.x.x builds. The idea is to create a Modal Image that has an OpenACC-enabled GPU workflow, based on NVIDIA’s HPC SDK. The result is a self-contained image that can run GPU-accelerated VASP calculations in a serverless Modal environment.

A simple guide for compiling ABACUS to run with GPU acceleration in Modal. The post explains how to build ABACUS with CUDA support and run DFT calculations in a serverless environment. It covers why Modal’s on‑demand GPUs (like A100) can help, and which ABACUS setup (plane waves with basis_type pw and ks_solver bpcg) tends to work best on GPUs in version 3.9.0.

This post shares progress on calculating magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE) using density functional theory (DFT). The author hoped to use machine learning, but data limits make that unlikely for now, so DFT remains the focus. They emphasize how sensitive MAE is to convergence and accurate electronic structure, a common concern in the field. Two calculation methods are explored: the force-theorem and total energy difference. The force-theorem aims for a balance between speed and accuracy but isn’t fully working yet; issues include needing a specific spin setup and changes in the Fermi level when magnetization directions change. The total energy difference method is simpler and more reliable but far more computationally demanding, requiring several full SCF runs with spin-orbit coupling. Key parameters like k-point spacing, smearing, basis type, and ks_solver influence results and performance. The post notes GPU acceleration and the practical trade-offs, and promises more metrics and a public API later.

Discover how Filipino players win big on Pusta88 slots. Learn jackpot strategies, bankroll tips, and consistent play habits to master online slot games in the Philippines.

Since our founding, Frazier Pest Control has been dedicated to protecting the homes and businesses of Cathedral City from unwanted pests.

Core Idea: Train a GNN from scratch to predict MAE using CHGNet-derived features: Node features: CHGNet latent embeddings (structural context) + CHGNet magmom predictions (explicit magnetic state)

I'm excited to share a new page I've been building out this week. You may have already seen it, as it's the first page you be redirected to after sign in.

is a post about running molecular dynamics simulations to study how a Cu-Zr alloy forms a metallic glass. The author uses a 64% Cu and 36% Zr composition, an (10,10,10) supercell, and the orb-v3-direct-20-omat calculator to push speed and scale. The workflow includes equilibrating a melted alloy at high temperature, then rapid quenching from 2000 K to 300 K at various rates to compare glass formation versus crystallization. The write-up explains key concepts like what glass is in atomic terms, the difference between crystalline order and amorphous structure, and how RDF and coordination numbers help analyze results. It also notes the challenges of achieving crystallization in MD due to time scales and suggests exploring different cooling rates and compositions in future runs. The post includes example data and 3D visualization references to support the findings.

explains how to pick from eight Orb-v3 models that balance accuracy, speed, and memory for atomistic simulations. The post breaks down model names (orb-v3-X-Y-Z), where X is how forces are computed, Y is neighbor limits, and Z is the training dataset (omat or mpa). It compares conservative vs direct force calculations, unlimited vs limited neighbors, and AIMD-based -omat versus MPTraj/Alexandria-based -mpa models. Readers gain practical guidance for phonon calculations, geometry optimization, and molecular dynamics, including which models excel at energy conservation, speed, or large-scale simulations. The piece also covers workflow tips, performance at scale, and licensing (Apache 2.0). Use this guide to choose the right Orb-v3 model for your system size and research goals.

Meso-scale all-atom simulations with Orb-v3 open a new frontier in materials science and chemistry. This post discusses using ASE for molecular dynamics on GPUs (A100, H100, H200) via Modal, enabling larger, more affordable simulations than traditional DFT. It highlights metallic glass formation, crystallization, annealing, and emergent phenomena that arise from thousands of atoms. The focus is on a breakthrough in non-conservative architectures that balance memory use and speed, making complex systems feasible to study.

Overview of the current work and future enhancements for magnetic hysteresis simulations

A post about trying to use HamGNN with TB2J to forecast magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy, only to find the pre-trained model lacks the needed physics. The main gap is the absence of spin-polarization in H0, making the model better suited for SOC in non-magnetic materials, not for magnetic predictions. Potential outputs still relevant to SOC include band structure corrections, topological invariants, spin textures in k-space, orbital angular momentum, spin Hall conductivity, g-factors, effective masses, and optical properties. The use case focuses on non-magnetic materials and topological insulators without magnetism. Next steps involve exploring new Hamiltonian models like DeepH-pack and MACE-H, noting they lack pre-trained models. The plan is to gather consistent data, ensure SOC and spin-polarization, and align data sources from the same DFT software. Links: https://github.com/mzjb/DeepH-pack, https://github.com/maurergroup/MACE-H.

Once again we're at a stopping point because of our inability to effectively predict MAE. Our AI discovery agents have discovered materials that have all the properties we can currently predict. This

A clear look at using LLMs for materials discovery. This post summarizes how Victor from Lila Sciences and the author compare their AI workflows, focusing on mutations in crystal structures, machine learning force fields (MLFF), and machine learning property predictors (MLPP). It explains why data limits push researchers toward direct reasoning with AI, the role of modification history and self-reflection, and how prompts influence performance. Key takeaways include constraints in rare-earth-free magnet design, the balance between control and relaxation, and the impact of self-reflection on speeding up convergence to target properties like band gap and formation energy. The notes also touch on challenges with crystal symmetry, CIF generation, and future work in MLIP/MLPP accuracy. A practical read for anyone exploring automated materials discovery and AI-driven design.