Ouro
  • Docs
  • Blog
Join for freeSign in
  • Teams
  • Search
Assets
  • Quests
  • Posts
  • APIs
  • Data
  • Teams
  • Search
Assets
  • Quests
  • Posts
  • APIs
  • Data
3mo
270 views

On this page

  • MAE Testing the Treequest Search
Loading compatible actions...

MAE Testing the Treequest Search

After ran the pipeline, we are left with a handful of our best candidates to continue validating. The next filter they need to pass is a decent magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy.

Check out Will's writeup on the methodology:

Tree Searching for New Magnets

post

Detailing our open experimentation with SakanaAI's Treequest algorithm, AB-MCTS, and its potential applicability in rare-earth free permanent magnet discovery.

3mo

For reference, the MAE model predicts FePt at 3.07 meV. This is really good! I haven't directly tested Nd₂Fe₁₄B but literature reports values around 2.9 meV per unit cell. Anything above ~2.5 is likely to be a good candidate! Most materials are less than 0.1 meV so when you have values of multiple meV that's a solid material.

Now let's take a look at some of the top candidates:


Fe2NiMn (Pmm2) - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -31.6444 eV; energy change = -0.0024 eV; symmetry: Pmm2 → Pmm2

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 4

  • Magnetization density: 0.118825

  • e_above_hull: 0.066408 eV/atom

  • Curie temperature: 672.8 K

  • No imaginary modes detected

  • Easy axis z: -9789.619323 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • Hard axis x: -9789.619306 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 0.016494 meV


FeCoNiPt (Pmmm) - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -27.9506 eV; energy change = 0.0000 eV; symmetry: Pmmm → Pmmm

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 4

  • Magnetization density: 0.096695

  • e_above_hull: 0.0 eV/atom

  • Curie temperature: 591.84 K

  • No imaginary modes detected

  • Easy axis z: -9206.405781 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • Hard axis x: -9206.402854 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 2.927303 meV

Great first result. Checks all our boxes. Slightly low on the magnetic saturation.


Fe2CoAl (Pmm2) - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -28.3771 eV; energy change = -0.0092 eV; symmetry: Pmm2 → Pmm2

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 4

  • Magnetization density: 0.127557

  • e_above_hull: 0.134595 eV/atom

  • Curie temperature: 745.58 K

  • No imaginary modes detected

  • Easy axis z: -7302.045922 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • Hard axis x: -7302.045903 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 0.018796 meV


Fe15Ir (Pm-3m)

.cif file

Fe15Ir (space group: Pm-3m #221, crystal system: cubic, point group: m-3m)

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 16

  • Easy axis z: -35245.522685 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • Hard axis x: -35245.518820 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 3.865130 meV

Not a realistic candidate but an interesting test. Iridium is extremely expensive. More expensive than Platinum. But look at the size of that MAE 👀


Fe2CoGe (Pmm2) - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -28.5764 eV; energy change = -0.0556 eV; symmetry: Pmm2 → Pmm2

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 4

  • Easy axis x: -7645.989053 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • Hard axis z: -7645.989006 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 0.047192 meV


gen_9 FeCoPt - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -191.0519 eV; energy change = -0.0024 eV; symmetry: Imm2 → Imm2

3mo

Unable to test! Crashed the model. Not sure what's up at this point. It's a MatterGen generation - they've been giving me all sorts of trouble recently.


Fe3CoN - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -40.7885 eV; energy change = 0.0000 eV; symmetry: Pm-3m → Pm-3m

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 5

  • Easy axis z: -9726.391907 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • Hard axis x: -9726.391869 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 0.037788 meV


MnBi (P6_3/mmc) - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -25.2515 eV; energy change = 0.0000 eV; symmetry: P6_3/mmc → P6_3/mmc

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 4

  • Magnetization density: 0.076451

  • e_above_hull: 0.184240 eV/atom

  • Curie temperature: 546.18 K

  • No imaginary modes detected

  • Easy axis x: -7960.833456 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • Hard axis z: -7960.830609 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 2.847346 meV

This was good to see! MnBi is a known good candidate. The first non-rare material with a high MAE I've seen. Struggles on Ms and Curie but it was still a good confirmation on the model's ability to predict.


Let's see if we can take what we found in MnBi and crank up the Ms a bit:

MnFe6Bi (P4/mmm) - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -61.5567 eV; energy change = -0.0596 eV; symmetry: P4/mmm → P4/mmm

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 8

  • Magnetization density: 0.159473

  • e_above_hull: 0.254313 eV/atom

  • Curie temperature: 637.98 K

  • No imaginary modes detected

  • Easy axis y: -17840.774452 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=90.0°)

  • Hard axis z: -17840.771466 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 2.985789 meV

Exciting! Good MAE and good Ms from this one. Only issue is it's formation energy is high. ehull around 0.250.

MnFe6Bi phase diagram

.html file

Phase diagram of MnFe6Bi; e_above_hull: 0.254313 eV/atom; predicted_stable: False

3mo

gen_Co2Fe1Pt1_4_1 - relaxed

.cif file

Relaxed with Orb v3; 0.03 eV/Å threshold; final energy = -29.1047 eV; energy change = -0.0019 eV; symmetry: P4/mmm → P4/mmm

3mo
  • Number of atoms in the cell: 4

  • Magnetization density: 0.124042

  • e_above_hull: 0.01735 eV/atom

  • Curie temperature: 855.55 K

  • No imaginary modes detected

  • Easy axis z: -8851.951103 eV (θ=0.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • Hard axis x: -8851.947816 eV (θ=90.0°, φ=0.0°)

  • ΔMAE (hard-easy): 3.287396 meV

Pretty good performance. We need to figure out the role of Ni and if that is needed. All this MAE is coming from the Pt which is expensive, so we should figure out alternatives like MnBi.


Will be testing more throughout the day.

Loading comments...
    1 reference
    • Tree Searching Conclusions (1st Iteration)

      post

      Findings from the first pass at tree searching

      3mo