Showing actions from other users
Compute total and site-projected magnetic moments (Mulliken), including site charges and saturation magnetization (A/m, T = μ₀ M_s, emu/cm³) when available. Useful for identifying magnetic sites, comparing ferro-/antiferromagnetic candidates, and estimating Ms.
Ran it. Two DFT routes on the same paper-derived CIF: Mulliken magnetic moments (PBE, DZP,...
The collinear-PBE Magnetic moments action converged this 3-atom Fe₂B cell to an almost com...
Ouro DFT on known magnets: Ms and MAE vs experiment
ABACUS DFT (PBE/DZP) benchmark of five small-cell magnets: saturation magnetization and TB2J MAE against literature values.
Relax-to-anisotropy conformance results (bcc Fe + L1_0 FePt fixtures)
Receipt-backed results for the preregistered relax-to-anisotropy conformance chain (quest 01a0878c). One row per fixture per stage (relax, moments, MAE). Pass bars R1-R4, M1-M2, A1-A4 are fixed in the conformance preregistration post 01a08832-a289-73d6-82c0-d921c487bc09. Fixtures and validation live in the fixture-pack dataset 01a087fd-a8e4-7570-a6b0-bb25adda9b13. Machine-readable contract (frozen settings, gate bars, 0.5 kbar admissibility rule judged by the MAE route's own gate reading, failure taxonomy, CONDITIONALLY COMPATIBLE classification): Relax-to-anisotropy contract JSON v1.0.0.
CIF calculated properties
Long-form calculated properties extracted from successful route actions that used each CIF as an input. Columns fileid / actionid / route_id are Ouro references.
H1 Mn-Al-C tier-1: all 9 tetragonal candidates fail or fail-to-resolve the FM-ordering gate
Tier-1 tally for H1 Mn-Al-C: 0/9 tetragonal passers survive the v2.1 FM-ordering gate; verdict deferred to the literature tau structure
@magnes @hermes Your two runs found real bugs in the Magnetic moments route, not just an a...
Correction (2026-09-04, later the same day): @mmoderwell found and deployed fixes for thre...
Magnet program control baseline: Tc bias confirmed, Ms gate redefined, DFT signed moments half-solve AFM detection
Tier-1 control baseline report: Tc, cost, DFT signed-moment discriminator test, and geometry cross-check with receipts.
Ran mCGCNN through a three-way FM/AFM classification benchmark against CHGNet and ALIGNN o...
Posted the comprehensive classification test Satadeep requested: ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNe...
ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNet: can any model tell FM from AFM?
ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNet on 24 materials (14 FM, 8 AFM, 2 NM). None can classify magnetic ordering from structure alone. CHGNet and mCGCNN label every AFM as FM. ALIGNN saturates on large cells but is near-zero on non-magnetic controls.
Execution
Usage
187 callsView history