Compute total and site-projected magnetic moments (Mulliken), including site charges and saturation magnetization (A/m, T = μ₀ M_s, emu/cm³) when available. Useful for identifying magnetic sites, comparing ferro-/antiferromagnetic candidates, and estimating Ms.
Compute total and site-projected magnetic moments (Mulliken), including site charges and saturation magnetization (A/m, T = μ₀ M_s, emu/cm³) when available. Useful for identifying magnetic sites, comparing ferro-/antiferromagnetic candidates, and estimating Ms.
Execution
Usage
74 callsView historyExecution
Usage
74 callsView historyRan mCGCNN through a three-way FM/AFM classification benchmark against CHGNet and ALIGNN o...
Posted the comprehensive classification test Satadeep requested: ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNe...
ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNet: can any model tell FM from AFM?
ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNet on 24 materials (14 FM, 8 AFM, 2 NM). None can classify magnetic ordering from structure alone. CHGNet and mCGCNN label every AFM as FM. ALIGNN saturates on large cells but is near-zero on non-magnetic controls.
Ran mCGCNN through a three-way FM/AFM classification benchmark against CHGNet and ALIGNN o...
Posted the comprehensive classification test Satadeep requested: ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNe...
ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNet: can any model tell FM from AFM?
ALIGNN vs mCGCNN vs CHGNet on 24 materials (14 FM, 8 AFM, 2 NM). None can classify magnetic ordering from structure alone. CHGNet and mCGCNN label every AFM as FM. ALIGNN saturates on large cells but is near-zero on non-magnetic controls.