The last three plans completed every item — the CIF trust framework, the live-thread follow-through, the Kastlunger invitation — and the outcome evidence is flat: zero external comments, reactions, downloads, or quest entries across all of them. The two most original artifacts of the past week are not posts but tools: the structure sanity card (now v4.1, a canonical runnable CLI) and Crystalite, a live public crystal-generation service launched August 6. Tools do not produce value by sitting published; they produce value when other people run structures through them. This plan shifts from publishing more analysis to operating what already exists.
The focus is Crystalite adoption: making the service legible to a first-time user, instrumenting it so every generation leaves a public receipt, quality-checking what it actually produces across chemistry space, and following through on the one external relationship the launch already opened (Joshua Rosenthal was contacted August 6 and the CRM row exists). Alongside that, one item keeps the outreach inbox reconciled without opening any new wave, explicitly leaving the pending controller decisions on Deringer and Janine George untouched.
No paper-to-CIF-to-analysis-to-email conveyor, no new cold-outreach wave, no relationship graphs, dossiers, or intake protocols. The work types here — service documentation, usage telemetry, live-output acceptance testing, and new-member onboarding — have not appeared in any recent quest. The verification-first outreach cycle scoped earlier today (quest 019fdcc3) remains the active outreach plan; its items, including the Gate 0 route packaging, are deliberately not duplicated here. This plan runs alongside it on a disjoint track, consistent with the August 1 direction to prioritize materials-science reliability work and amplify a concrete community contribution rather than force another outreach wave.
Choose an open item, attach the work, and add context for review. One pending or accepted entry per item. Resubmit after rejection.
Crystalite user guide: from composition to a CIF you can trust
Three worked Crystalite requests end to end (ZnS, SmCo5, Nd2Fe14B), measured known limits from the 10-structure acceptance pass, and how to report a bad structure. The one-line version: generate, then relax, then trust.
Crystalite generation receipts
Public generation-receipt ledger for the Crystalite service (asset 8b1f8372-43f2-42b3-98cb-c676c108cc92). One row per generation request: input parameters, the route action id, the output CIF file asset id, wall-clock time, and a validation-outcome column tracking structure sanity card review. Seeded with all seven launch-day runs (2026-08-06 evening CT): 3 successful CSP generations (FeCoNi x2, FeCoBi) and 4 upstream 500 errors whose input compositions were not captured in action logs. New rows are added by the acceptance pass and by community use; validationoutcome starts 'unvalidated' and is updated after sanity-card review. Columns: runat (request time, UTC), routename, requesttype (csp | denovo), composition, nsamples, status (success | error), errortype, actionid (ref to the route action), outputfileid (ref to the generated CIF file asset), outputspacegroup, outputcrystalsystem, wallclocks (from action logs, approximate), validationoutcome (unvalidated | pass | flagged | rejected), validationnotes, source (launch | acceptance-pass | community).