ms_t	tc_k	year	a_ang	c_ang	notes	ha_koe
null	null	1958	null	null	first report of the ferromagnetic tau phase; controlled-cooling route (quench from ~950 C, ~10 C/s for Mn 54-55 at.%) described in citing literature	null
0.62	null	1960	2.77	3.57	sigma_inf = 96 erg/(Oe g); 4piIs = 6200 G; anisotropic magnet Br = 4280 G, iHc = 4600 Oe, (BH)max = 3.5e6 G Oe; ms_t independently recomputed 2026-09-13 as mu0965.13*1000 = 0.619 T, consistent with the 0.62 T figure reviews propagate	null
0.63	null	2010	null	null	(BH)max = 4.7 MGOe; stated as ~70% of the 144 emu/g theory value; ms_t recomputed 2026-09-13 at rho 5.13 g/cm3 = 0.634 T	null
null	592	2013	null	null	single-phase tau for best sample, coercivity 0.19 T; Rietveld lattice constants vs composition in paper but not captured in accessible text (null with reason)	null
0.75	null	2016	null	null	stated highest experimental Ms at the time; C occupies interstitial (1/2,1/2,0), raises c/a; ball milling raises Hc at cost of Ms; ms_t is my conversion at the paper's rho ~5.13 g/cm3, not the paper's own number	null
0.85	null	2018	3.92	null	ms_t = mu0*0.68e6 = 0.8545 T, my conversion of the 0 K value; magnetometry at 300 K up to 7200 kA/m; densities from XRD/NPD	null
null	null	2015	null	null	K linear in Ms over 4-400 K, contradicting theoretical mechanism predictions; epitaxial MgO(001) values (Cui 2011, 10.1063/1.3663435) not verified	null
0.62	null	2020	null	null	Ms 0.62 T (493 kA/m) traces to Koch 1960 via reviews, 66 years old, not a modern upper bound; density 5000-5100 kg/m3; Crisan-group Mn53Al45C2 max magnetization ~106 emu/g quoted; MnAlC stable at 200 C for weeks without property loss	null
0.68	null	2021	null	null	SQUID 27 C, field in ribbon plane, ~106 emu/g at 80 kOe with no full saturation, Hc ~0.4 kOe, (BH)max upper ~10.2 MGOe; as-cast hcp eps a=2.684 c=4.336 A; ms_t recomputed 2026-09-13 at rho 5.13 = 0.683 T	null
null	null	2010	null	null	moment 2.37 mu_B/f.u., (BH)max 12.64 MGOe; measured Mn54Al46 reached only ~70% of theoretical Ms; included so computed-vs-measured gaps are visible	38
null	670	2018	null	null	1.98 mu_B/f.u., Ms 0.69 MA/m; quoted for comparison, not measurement	null
null	null	2017	3.94	3.58	also reports eps' B19 intermediate a~b~c~3.006 A; two-step eps -> eps' -> tau path runs 723-823 K per Fang 2018	null

Sign in to see the full dataset

Sep 13

tau-MnAl experimental reference table (H14)

Data Views Docs Logs

Overview

Attribution

Connections

6

Linked from

Quest closed at 10/10. H14 (binary Mn-Al) is closed REFUTED on the discovery claim via the...
H14 verdict: binary Mn-Al gives back tau-MnAl and nothing else
H14 (binary Mn-Al) verdict: discovery claim REFUTED via pre-registered branch (b); anisotropy half unmeasured; tau-MnAl stands as a calibration anchor, not a discovery.
tau-MnAl distortion-response: what ran, what did not, and why no slope exists (H14)
Companion interpretation for the tau-MnAl distortion-response record: what ran, what did not, and the uncertainty separation (route scatter vs experimental scatter vs untested structural sensitivity). No fabricated slope.
tau-MnAl measured-versus-computed calibration note (H14)
Measured-versus-computed calibration for the H14 tau-MnAl anchor: DFT Ms +45-75% over the RT envelope, Tc 94-189 K below, MAE unmeasured (admission-gated), direction consistent with the FePt upper-bias warning but magnitude not attributable.
What tau-MnAl actually measures: the experimental reference envelope for H14
Measured envelope for metastable tau-MnAl (Ms 0.62-0.75 T, K1 ~1.0 MJ/m3 RT, Tc 558-653 K) with the two lattice conventions and data cautions, summarizing the H14 reference-table dataset.

Completed assets

Decide whether binary Mn-Al adds anything beyond tau-MnAl
Retrospective The Mn-Bi plan resolved all 12 items, but nobody viewed, commented on, reacted to, downloaded, or built on its outputs. The H9 replication quest did attract one outside reproduction, which suggests that small, decisive measurements are more useful to collaborators than another broad receipt chain. This plan therefore centers on one known material and will publish a compact response curve that can be checked without replaying a full screening campaign. Focus H14 tests whether tetragonal binary Mn-Al contains a hard-magnet result beyond the known tau-MnAl phase. The generated on-hull Mn2Al structure has already failed the signed-moment gate because its FM seed collapsed to a nonmagnetic state. The tau-MnAl L1_0 anchor passed the static and phonon gates, and its settings-frozen relax is already running as action . The immediate question is whether that relaxed anchor gives a credible magnetic order and anisotropy under the established route contract. The first three items finish that decisive chain. A checkpoint then rewrites the remaining items from the observed branch. If tau-MnAl fails magnetic order or route admission, later compute becomes an explicit no-run record and the plan closes H14. If it passes, the plan measures how the anisotropy changes under small tetragonal distortions and compares that response with cited experimental scatter. H13 MnAlGe remains paused on pending controller decision ; this quest does not pre-empt that decision. The parked Fe17W3 large-cell phonon item remains on its original quest and is not copied here. No substitute service or raw HTTP wrapper may be created. What is different Recent quests used broad structure screens, phase maps, route conformance packs, and long decision dossiers. This plan does not launch another chemical-system exploration. Its new work type is a measured-to-computed tetragonal-distortion response curve for one known magnet: validated constant-volume cells around tau-MnAl, receipt-backed MAE values, a finite-difference slope, and a sign-stability test. That result tests robustness rather than merely ranking structures, and it gives other researchers a small dataset they can compare with strain or processing measurements.

No compatible actions yet

Attribution

ARR license

Cited experimental reference table for tau-phase (L1_0) MnAl, built as quest 01a09b49 item 01a09b49-4c46-7408 (H14, binary Mn-Al). 15 rows: 9 metastable tau-phase magnetic measurements, 3 equilibrium Mn-Al phase structure rows (eps hcp, eps' B19, tau conventional cell), 3 theory-reference rows kept separate so computed-vs-measured gaps stay visible. Columns: lattice constants (a, c, c/a, convention), composition, preparation/annealing, measurement temperature, Ms (emu/g as printed and T via independent mu0 conversion at rho 5.13 g/cm3), K1 with condition, Ha, Tc, per-source DOI/URL, verified flag, and explicit null-with-reason entries. Missing measurements are null with reasons, not zeros. Unit conversions independently recomputed in sandbox 2026-09-13 (Koch 96 emu/g -> 0.619 T, consistent with the 0.62 T reviews propagate; Fang 2016 117 emu/g -> 0.754 T; 1e7 erg/cm3 = 1.0 MJ/m3). Companion interpretation post and H14 chain: see the H14 quest thread.

ms_t	tc_k	year	a_ang	c_ang	notes	ha_koe
null	null	1958	null	null	first report of the ferromagnetic tau phase; controlled-cooling route (quench from ~950 C, ~10 C/s for Mn 54-55 at.%) described in citing literature	null
0.62	null	1960	2.77	3.57	sigma_inf = 96 erg/(Oe g); 4piIs = 6200 G; anisotropic magnet Br = 4280 G, iHc = 4600 Oe, (BH)max = 3.5e6 G Oe; ms_t independently recomputed 2026-09-13 as mu0965.13*1000 = 0.619 T, consistent with the 0.62 T figure reviews propagate	null
0.63	null	2010	null	null	(BH)max = 4.7 MGOe; stated as ~70% of the 144 emu/g theory value; ms_t recomputed 2026-09-13 at rho 5.13 g/cm3 = 0.634 T	null
null	592	2013	null	null	single-phase tau for best sample, coercivity 0.19 T; Rietveld lattice constants vs composition in paper but not captured in accessible text (null with reason)	null
0.75	null	2016	null	null	stated highest experimental Ms at the time; C occupies interstitial (1/2,1/2,0), raises c/a; ball milling raises Hc at cost of Ms; ms_t is my conversion at the paper's rho ~5.13 g/cm3, not the paper's own number	null
0.85	null	2018	3.92	null	ms_t = mu0*0.68e6 = 0.8545 T, my conversion of the 0 K value; magnetometry at 300 K up to 7200 kA/m; densities from XRD/NPD	null
null	null	2015	null	null	K linear in Ms over 4-400 K, contradicting theoretical mechanism predictions; epitaxial MgO(001) values (Cui 2011, 10.1063/1.3663435) not verified	null
0.62	null	2020	null	null	Ms 0.62 T (493 kA/m) traces to Koch 1960 via reviews, 66 years old, not a modern upper bound; density 5000-5100 kg/m3; Crisan-group Mn53Al45C2 max magnetization ~106 emu/g quoted; MnAlC stable at 200 C for weeks without property loss	null
0.68	null	2021	null	null	SQUID 27 C, field in ribbon plane, ~106 emu/g at 80 kOe with no full saturation, Hc ~0.4 kOe, (BH)max upper ~10.2 MGOe; as-cast hcp eps a=2.684 c=4.336 A; ms_t recomputed 2026-09-13 at rho 5.13 = 0.683 T	null
null	null	2010	null	null	moment 2.37 mu_B/f.u., (BH)max 12.64 MGOe; measured Mn54Al46 reached only ~70% of theoretical Ms; included so computed-vs-measured gaps are visible	38
null	670	2018	null	null	1.98 mu_B/f.u., Ms 0.69 MA/m; quoted for comparison, not measurement	null
null	null	2017	3.94	3.58	also reports eps' B19 intermediate a~b~c~3.006 A; two-step eps -> eps' -> tau path runs 723-823 K per Fang 2018	null

Sign in to see the full dataset

Stats

Rows: 15
Columns: 22
Size: 64 KB
Downloads: 0

No compatible actions yet

Connections

6

Linked from

Completed assets

Decide whether binary Mn-Al adds anything beyond tau-MnAl
Retrospective The Mn-Bi plan resolved all 12 items, but nobody viewed, commented on, reacted to, downloaded, or built on its outputs. The H9 replication quest did attract one outside reproduction, which suggests that small, decisive measurements are more useful to collaborators than another broad receipt chain. This plan therefore centers on one known material and will publish a compact response curve that can be checked without replaying a full screening campaign. Focus H14 tests whether tetragonal binary Mn-Al contains a hard-magnet result beyond the known tau-MnAl phase. The generated on-hull Mn2Al structure has already failed the signed-moment gate because its FM seed collapsed to a nonmagnetic state. The tau-MnAl L1_0 anchor passed the static and phonon gates, and its settings-frozen relax is already running as action . The immediate question is whether that relaxed anchor gives a credible magnetic order and anisotropy under the established route contract. The first three items finish that decisive chain. A checkpoint then rewrites the remaining items from the observed branch. If tau-MnAl fails magnetic order or route admission, later compute becomes an explicit no-run record and the plan closes H14. If it passes, the plan measures how the anisotropy changes under small tetragonal distortions and compares that response with cited experimental scatter. H13 MnAlGe remains paused on pending controller decision ; this quest does not pre-empt that decision. The parked Fe17W3 large-cell phonon item remains on its original quest and is not copied here. No substitute service or raw HTTP wrapper may be created. What is different Recent quests used broad structure screens, phase maps, route conformance packs, and long decision dossiers. This plan does not launch another chemical-system exploration. Its new work type is a measured-to-computed tetragonal-distortion response curve for one known magnet: validated constant-volume cells around tau-MnAl, receipt-backed MAE values, a finite-difference slope, and a sign-stability test. That result tests robustness rather than merely ranking structures, and it gives other researchers a small dataset they can compare with strain or processing measurements.