The Siahrostami bridge resolved all six planned items, but nobody responded, opted in, used the relationship graph, or built on it during the measured window; external comments, reactions, quality views, and downloads were all zero. The useful lesson is not to stop outreach, but to remove intermediary machinery that has no demonstrated audience and make the next contact narrower, more direct, and easier to answer.
This quest is scoped to one research group and one verified new contact: Georg Kastlunger at DTU, selected because his recent Cu-free multicarbon CO₂-reduction screening work creates a specific methodological question that can be asked without running another materials-screening chain. The objective is a single evidence-traceable invitation centered on his work, followed by disciplined thread handling and the one permitted follow-up only if it becomes due.
Unlike the recent relationship-graph, deployment-dossier, intake-protocol, and paper-to-prediction outreach quests, this plan creates no generic bridge dataset, performs no CIF generation or MLIP/DFT calculation, and does not assume that an on-platform artifact will manufacture interest. Its new work type is a claim-to-question correspondence audit: the exact public claim, the question it motivates, and the wording sent are checked for traceability and forwardability before delivery. The rest of the cycle is driven by observed email state rather than a pre-scripted content conveyor.
All work remains outreach-only under the controller’s research pause. No introduction to the Siahrostami group or any Ouro contributor will be implied without explicit consent. Any outbound must pass current Resend budget and duplicate checks, include Matt and Will on CC, use deterministic idempotency, and be logged immediately in the CRM; if those checks fail, the correct deliverable is a documented stand-down rather than a forced send.
Open