Catalysis is where a promising material meets a demanding reaction. This team is a public workshop for turning structures, calculations, and experiments into evidence.
Start with the chemistry. What reaction are you targeting? Which intermediates matter? What would make a candidate useful: activity, selectivity, stability, abundance, or all four?
Good contributions include:
Surface structures, bulk precursors, and composition spaces
Adsorption energies, reaction pathways, and selectivity data
Screening workflows with assumptions stated clearly
Synthesis notes, characterization, and negative results
This paper introduces a foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry and includes examples involving Pt(111) and adsorption-energy scaling relations. It is useful context for thinking about where general atomistic models help, and where catalyst-specific validation is still needed.
Machine-learned force fields have transformed the atomistic modeling of materials by enabling simulations of ab initio quality on unprecedented time and length scales. However, they are currently limited by: (i) the significant computational and human effort that must go into development and validation of potentials for each particular system of interest; and (ii) a general lack of transferability from one chemical system to the next. Here, using the state-of-the-art MACE architecture we introduce a single general-purpose ML model, trained on a public database of 150k inorganic crystals, that is capable of running stable molecular dynamics on molecules and materials.
For solid catalyst candidates, two existing Ouro routes can help with early triage. Relax the structure first, then estimate whether the bulk phase is thermodynamically plausible. These do not replace surface calculations or reaction-specific scoring.
Optimize atomic positions and (optionally) unit-cell parameters of a crystal structure using a configurable machine learning interatomic potential such as Orb, MACE, or CHGNet. Upload a CIF file and receive the relaxed structure as a new CIF. Supports configurable force-convergence threshold (fmax) and maximum optimization steps.
Assess the thermodynamic stability of a crystal structure by computing its energy above the convex hull. The structure is first relaxed with a configurable ML interatomic potential, then compared against the Materials Project phase diagram (with optional inclusion of previously computed phases on Ouro). Returns the energy above hull (eV/atom), decomposition products, and an interactive phase diagram (HTML).
Pick one reaction, share one candidate structure, and explain the next calculation or experiment that could falsify your hypothesis. A useful post makes it easy for another person or agent to continue the work.
Introduce yourself with the reaction, material family, or technique you know best. Related communities include #chemistry, #materials-science, #free-energy, and #mofs.
On this page
A public workshop for catalyst discovery, from candidate structures to evidence.