Reference period: Week 49, 2025
Latest price: $59.47 per barrel (WTI front-month futures)
WTI crude prices are projected to rise moderately over the next 12 months, moving from about $59.5 now to roughly $70–71 per barrel by late 2026, with significant volatility along the way (trading mostly in a $60–75 range and briefly dipping into the mid‑$50s).
This forecast is consistent with the current market context:
Geopolitical risk premium is increasing (Russia–Ukraine energy infrastructure attacks, stalled peace talks, and US escalation toward Venezuela’s oil sector), which supports higher prices.
Cyclical demand softness and ample inventories are capping near-term upside, preventing a surge into sustained high-$70s or higher.
For decision makers, the key takeaway is that oil is likely to be somewhat more expensive on average over the coming year than it is today, but still range‑bound rather than in a runaway bull market. Planning assumptions should emphasize:
Baseline: mid‑to‑high $60s per barrel, trending toward low $70s.
Risk band: roughly $55–$75, with short-lived excursions possible outside this range if geopolitical shocks intensify or demand weakens sharply.
Forecasts for Crude Oil Price (WTI) with 52-period horizon (weekly)
The chart reflects:
A sharp move higher in the near term.
A volatile but broadly upward path through mid‑2026.
A temporary dip around April 2026.
A return to the high‑$60s/low‑$70s band toward year-end 2026.
The current environment combines heightened geopolitical tension with fundamental headwinds from demand and inventories:
Russia–Ukraine energy conflict
Ukraine has attacked the Druzhba oil pipeline in Russia’s Tambov region for the fifth time.
The route supplies Hungary and Slovakia—flows are currently reported as normal, but repeated attacks underscore vulnerability.
Stalled peace talks and a lack of breakthrough from US–Kremlin discussions increase the durability of the risk premium.
US policy toward Venezuela
The US has escalated threats against Venezuela’s oil sector, raising questions about the future of Venezuelan exports.
Any tightening of sanctions or enforcement could constrain heavy crude supply, supporting prices, especially in the Atlantic Basin.
Inventory builds and demand soft patch
EIA data show US crude stocks rose by 574,000 barrels, with gasoline and distillate stocks also increasing.
This signals weak refinery runs and/or soft product demand, both of which limit the near-term upside for crude.
Markets appear concerned about global demand, particularly in a context of slower industrial activity and muted freight demand.
This combination explains why WTI is currently near $59–60 rather than already in the mid‑$70s: risk premium is rising, but macro and inventory fundamentals are leaning the other way.
Based on the provided weekly forecast (Dec 2025–Dec 2026):
Near-term (next 1–2 months, to early Feb 2026)
Prices rise quickly into the high‑$60s to low‑$70s.
Within a month, the forecast peaks near $69–70, and by early March, briefly above $73–74.
This reflects markets increasingly pricing in geopolitical risk and potential constraints on Russian and Venezuelan exports.
Spring 2026 (roughly March–May)
After a March high around $73–74, prices decline into the low $60s and briefly to the mid-$50s (e.g., about $54 around late April 2026).
This is consistent with:
A phase of demand disappointment (e.g., softer global growth, high inventories), or
A temporary easing of supply concerns (e.g., rerouting flows, successful risk mitigation, or higher non‑OPEC output).
Mid‑2026 (May–July)
A rebound toward the low‑to‑mid $70s (around $72–75 by June).
The model implies that supportive supply decisions (e.g., OPEC+/allied cuts) or demand stabilization restore a firmer floor under prices.
Late 2026 (Aug–Dec)
Prices stabilize in a relatively tight band between the high‑$60s and low‑$70s.
By early December 2026, WTI is around $70–71, roughly $10–12 above current levels.
This suggests markets anticipate:
A persistent but manageable geopolitical risk premium, and
Balanced supply–demand, neither strongly oversupplied nor tightly constrained.
Implied annual profile:
Average level: mid‑to‑high $60s.
Volatility: intra‑year range roughly $54–75, meaning ~35–40% peak‑to‑trough variation around the current price.
5.1 Geopolitics and Supply Risk
Russian pipeline and infrastructure vulnerability
Repeated attacks on Druzhba suggest longer-term operational risk even if flows remain unaffected in the short term.
Markets typically price:
A risk premium for the probability of disruption, and
Potential higher transport and re-routing costs for crude flows.
US stance on Venezuela
Stricter enforcement or new sanctions would:
Limit heavy crude supply, especially relevant for certain refineries.
Increase regional spreads and overall price levels, particularly for WTI and Brent.
The forecast’s move into the high‑$60s/low‑$70s is consistent with some tightening of effective available supply.
5.2 Demand and Inventory Dynamics
Current inventory builds in the US point to:
Demand weakness now, or
A temporary oversupply due to strong production and steady imports.
The near-term jump in prices suggests that the model expects:
Demand to stabilize or modestly strengthen into early 2026, or
Market focus to shift from current inventory data toward forward supply risks.
The spring 2026 dip into the low $60s and mid‑$50s likely reflects:
Renewed worries about global growth (e.g., slower US or European activity; weaker emerging-market demand), and/or
Stronger non‑OPEC+ production (e.g., US shale, Brazil, Guyana) easing balances temporarily.
5.3 Producer Discipline and OPEC+ Behavior
The rebound and subsequent stabilization around $70 suggests:
OPEC+ and aligned producers are assumed to defend a price floor via production management.
Above mid‑$70s, additional US shale response and demand elasticity would tend to cap upside, consistent with the model’s reluctance to hold prices much beyond $74–75 for long stretches.
6.1 Corporates and Real-Economy Actors
Energy-intensive industries (transport, aviation, chemicals, manufacturing):
Budgeting and planning
It is prudent to build 2026 fuel and energy cost assumptions around $65–70 WTI, with sensitivity tests down to $55 and up to $75.
The projected ~10–20% increase from current levels implies some margin pressure if costs cannot be passed through.
Hedging strategy
The forecast suggests no structural collapse in prices, but repeated volatility.
Firms may consider:
Layered hedging (staggered forward purchases) to smooth exposure across the expected volatility band.
Using options for upside protection while preserving some benefit if the downside risk materializes (e.g., the mid‑$50s scenario in spring 2026).
Oil producers and energy companies:
Investment decisions
A sustained $65–70 environment supports maintenance capex and select growth projects, especially low-cost, short-cycle investments.
Marginal, high-cost projects still face risk if the downside scenario (mid‑$50s for longer) materializes, so capital discipline remains important.
Balance sheet and dividend policy
The forecast is consistent with continued cash generation, but with earnings volatility.
Maintaining liquidity buffers and flexible payout frameworks (base dividend + variable component) can help manage swings.
6.2 Policymakers and Central Banks
Inflation outlook
A move from ~$60 to ~$70 over a year would:
Add some temporary upward pressure to headline inflation, especially in fuel and transport components.
Have limited impact on core inflation unless sustained and amplified by wage or second‑round effects.
Monetary authorities should:
Differentiate between transient energy-driven spikes and underlying core trends,
Avoid overreacting to what appears as a moderate and manageable energy cost drift.
Energy security policy
Repeated attacks on Russian infrastructure and possible Venezuelan constraints underscore:
The importance of diversified import sources,
Strategic petroleum reserves as a buffer, and
Acceleration of energy efficiency and alternative energy investments to reduce exposure to geopolitical shocks.
6.3 Financial Market Participants
Asset allocation and risk management
The forecast implies:
Modest positive carry for investors positioned for higher oil, but
Substantial path risk due to mid‑year drawdown potential.
Portfolio managers should treat energy exposure as a volatile, macro-sensitive asset, not a one-way directional bet.
Credit markets
At $65–70 WTI, high-quality energy credits remain broadly supported.
Lower-quality, high-cost producers remain vulnerable in the downside price scenarios; covenant and liquidity analysis stays critical.
The baseline forecast is inherently uncertain. Key alternative scenarios:
Upside Risk: Escalation and Hard Supply Disruptions
More severe or sustained damage to Russian infrastructure, broader sanctions, or a significant reduction in Venezuelan exports.
Actual physical supply losses could push prices well above the modeled $75 upper band for a period.
Implication: Stronger inflation shock, tighter financial conditions, and sharper stress for energy-importing economies.
Downside Risk: Sharp Demand Slowdown
A more pronounced global growth slowdown or recession, especially in major consumers (US, Europe, China).
Oil demand could undershoot expectations, driving WTI below the mid‑$50s, potentially into the $40s–low $50s if OPEC+ coordination falters.
Implication: Relief on inflation, but at the cost of weaker growth and employment, and pressure on producer balance sheets.
Policy Surprise: Unexpected De-escalation or Supply Surge
A durable Russia–Ukraine ceasefire with secure energy flows or a meaningful increase in exports from currently constrained producers.
This would erode the risk premium and flatten the curve, pushing prices closer to or below current levels for longer.
Decision makers should not treat the baseline as deterministic; it is a central path among many plausible outcomes.
The data and context together point to a year ahead in which WTI crude is somewhat more expensive on average than it is today, but not in a disorderly spike:
Baseline trajectory: from about $59.5 now to around $70–71 in a year’s time, with intermediate peaks near $73–75 and a temporary dip into the mid‑$50s.
Economic meaning: a manageable but non-trivial energy cost headwind, a moderate support for energy-sector earnings, and a modest, likely temporary lift to headline inflation.
For planners and risk managers, the most robust stance is to:
Plan around $65–70 WTI as a working assumption,
Build contingencies for $55 downside and $75 upside, and
Treat geopolitical developments as the primary swing factor over the forecast horizon.
This report is based on the provided data and a forward-looking interpretation of that data. All forecasts are inherently uncertain and subject to change due to market, geopolitical, and economic developments. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment, trading, legal, or other professional advice, nor as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument or commodity.
On this page
WTI crude oil is expected to drift higher over the next year, moving from about $59–60 per barrel today to roughly $70–71 by late 2026, with plenty of ups and downs along the way. Prices are likely to stay roughly in a $60–75 range, with brief dips into the mid‑50s if shocks hit supply or demand weakens. The move higher is supported by geopolitics and risk premiums tied to attacks on oil infrastructure and potential limits on Venezuela’s exports, but near‑term gains are capped by softer demand and large inventories.